Senate leaders strike bipartisan deal to fund government past midterms, avert October shutdown

United States Senate

Coverage spread: 4 sources — 2 left · 1 center · 1 right

Lean ratings via AllSides / Media Bias-Fact-Check. How this works.

Where they agree

  • The Senate unveiled a bipartisan continuing resolution on Aug. 3 to fund the government at current levels through Dec. 11, avoiding a shutdown when funding lapses Sept. 30.
    Susan Collins and Patty Murray led the deal, which includes funding adjustments for nutrition programs (SNAP/WIC), disaster relief, and national security, and blocks a proposed OMB rule giving the administration more control over canceling grants.
    The bill closes a loophole that would let the administration redirect CBP funds to Border Patrol, addressing a key Democratic demand from Rosa DeLauro.
    The House already passed its own, different continuing resolution (through Dec. 4) before leaving for recess, meaning the chambers must reconcile competing versions in September.

Where they differ

  • The New York Post emphasizes internal GOP resistance, spotlighting Sen. John Kennedy’s blunt opposition and prediction that most Republicans and the House would reject the bill as negotiated.
    NBC News and CBS News frame the deal more as a completed bipartisan achievement, foregrounding Collins’ and Murray’s celebratory statements and the midterm-timing angle.
    CBS News gives the most detail on the House-Senate date mismatch (Dec. 4 vs. Dec. 11) and the process by which the House vote broke along party lines.
    The New York Post uniquely notes it had first reported on the OMB grants rule back in May, giving it added ownership of that thread of the story.

What the Senate agreed to

Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Vice Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) announced a bipartisan continuing resolution on Sunday, Aug. 3, that would keep most federal funding at current levels through Dec. 11, 2026. The move is aimed at avoiding a government shutdown when current funding expires at the end of the day on Sept. 30. The Senate held a procedural vote Monday, with leaders hoping to pass the bill this week before senators leave for August recess. A spokesperson for Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) noted the bill was released more than eight weeks ahead of the funding deadline.

Collins described the measure as straightforward and free of “poison pills,” while including targeted adjustments — called anomalies — for the SNAP and WIC nutrition programs, disaster relief, and national security accounts. She also said the bill scraps a proposed rule, first reported by the New York Post in May, that would have given the White House Office of Management and Budget greater authority over federal grants. Collins said she had pushed for changes to that rule in a July 6 letter, warning it could politicize grants and hurt rural communities, families, and biomedical research.

What Democrats say they got

Murray said the Senate version is “much-improved” compared to the House bill and rejects what she called “Trump’s frivolous war spending wish list.” She said it closes a loophole that would have let the administration shift funds from other Customs and Border Protection accounts into Border Patrol, which she argued “desperately needs reform, not more money.” The provision follows Democrats’ earlier refusal to fund immigration enforcement agencies. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called the deal “a responsible path forward” and credited Murray with blocking what he described as efforts to further politicize federal grants. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the top Democratic appropriator in the House, called the Senate bill “a clear improvement” over the House Republican version, which she had opposed because it lacked language addressing Border Patrol funding transfers.

Where the House stands

The House already passed its own continuing resolution on July 22, funding the government through Dec. 4 — a week earlier than the Senate’s Dec. 11 date — largely along party lines with some Democratic support. The House then left Washington for recess and won’t return until early September, leaving only a few weeks before the Sept. 30 deadline once it does. The two chambers will need to reconcile their competing bills, setting up a potential clash over the differences, including the Border Patrol funding language and the length of the extension.

Not all Republicans are on board

The bill’s path isn’t guaranteed. It needs 60 votes to clear the Senate’s filibuster threshold, and some Republican appropriators have signaled resistance. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that agreeing to Democratic demands — which he characterized as pressure from Schumer to kill the budget resolution and strip Trump’s authority to review government grants — would be a mistake. He said he would vote no and predicted most Republicans and the House would reject the bill if that’s what reached the floor. Kennedy instead argued for a “clean” continuing resolution without added provisions, and suggested that if Schumer wanted to risk a shutdown over these demands, “he should knock himself out,” while predicting Schumer ultimately wouldn’t do so.

Why the timing matters

Because the Senate’s stopgap would run through Dec. 11, it pushes any full-year funding fight past the November 2026 midterm elections, giving lawmakers room to negotiate a longer-term deal once election results clarify the political landscape. Collins, who faces a competitive re-election race in Maine this fall, has emphasized her record of brokering bipartisan funding deals as part of her campaign pitch to voters. The stopgap is intended as a bridge to further negotiations on full-year appropriations bills, which Collins said remains her preferred approach over repeated short-term patches.

Sources

Featured photo: Brady-Handy Photograph Collection (Library of Congress) via Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top