Iran sets slow-walk timetable for nuclear talks, betting on Trump’s midterm troubles

Strait of Hormuz

Coverage spread: 2 sources — 1 left · 1 international

Lean ratings via AllSides / Media Bias-Fact-Check. How this works.

Where they agree

  • Talks over reopening the Strait of Hormuz to shipping are the immediate focus, with Iran and Oman reporting they have agreed on shipping route coordinates.
  • Trump publicly insists the war is near its end and that he expects prices and tensions to ease soon.
  • Iran denies holding direct talks with the US, saying it negotiates only with Oman on the strait.
  • Trump recently called off a planned major strike on Iran, citing a nearing diplomatic breakthrough.

Where they differ

  • The Guardian frames the story around Iran’s strategic aim of dragging out talks to damage Trump politically before the midterms, invoking the 1979 hostage-crisis parallel with Jimmy Carter.
  • Al Jazeera focuses more on Trump’s own statements and the operational details of the Hormuz negotiations and a proposed Iranian bill barring US and Israeli vessels.
  • Al Jazeera raises US weapons/interceptor shortages and the strain on other military commands as a factor pressuring Trump, a detail the Guardian piece does not include.
  • The Guardian emphasizes Iranian public and official anger toward Trump personally (over Suleimani’s killing, Khamenei’s death, and the attempt on Pezeshkian’s life) as a driver of the strategy, while Al Jazeera’s coverage stays more procedural.

Iran has laid out a drawn-out negotiating schedule with the United States that would push any nuclear deal well past November’s midterm elections, according to reporting from Tehran. Iranian officials say a second phase of nuclear talks won’t begin for two to four months after a shipping agreement over the Strait of Hormuz is finalized, while President Trump has told reporters he believes the broader war “can’t go much longer” and expects it to end soon.

What did Iran’s deputy foreign minister actually say?

Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, told the state-run IRNA news agency that once Iran and the US agree on a route for commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, it would still take two to four months to reach the second phase of nuclear negotiations. That timeline replaces an earlier plan, laid out in a June memorandum of understanding, to start nuclear talks within 30 days — a schedule Gharibabadi said the Trump administration itself abandoned. Before nuclear talks can even begin, he said, Iran wants sanctions lifted, the US naval blockade of Iranian ports ended, frozen Iranian assets released, and new US commitments to non-belligerence. Taken together, that list of conditions could stretch negotiations well beyond the midterms.

What is happening with the Strait of Hormuz right now?

Iran and Oman said on Thursday they had agreed on coordinates for shipping routes through the strait, whose closure earlier in the conflict triggered a global energy crisis. Oman is acting as an intermediary because Iran has denied holding direct talks with the US, insisting it is negotiating only with Oman over control of the waterway. Iranian state media described the framework as close to being finalized, pending a final decision “at higher levels.” Separately, Fars news agency reported that an Iranian parliamentary committee is reviewing a bill that would bar US, Israeli and other “hostile” vessels from transiting the strait altogether — a move that would complicate any shipping deal.

What is Trump saying about the war’s status?

Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday that he thinks the war “is going to end pretty soon” and that he doesn’t believe Iran “can go much longer.” He said he is personally involved in negotiations and that things are “doing fine,” and separately promised that petrol prices will fall once the conflict ends. Last Saturday, Trump canceled a planned large-scale military strike on Iran, saying Tehran and other regional countries had asked the US to hold off because a diplomatic breakthrough was near. He also reacted angrily this week to US media reports suggesting American forces may be running low on weapons in the region — a shortage analysts say makes operations there more dangerous and is straining other US military commands, including in East Asia.

Why would Iran want to prolong the talks?

According to the Guardian, Iranian officials and state-linked media are explicitly hoping to keep Trump tied down in the conflict through the midterms, drawing a comparison to how the 1979-81 US embassy hostage crisis damaged Jimmy Carter’s presidency. Iranian media reportedly track Trump’s approval ratings and tie their decline to the war’s unpopularity and rising oil prices. Analysts quoted in the coverage, including Jason Brodsky of United Against a Nuclear Iran, say Tehran has no incentive to hand Trump a quiet resolution before voters go to the polls, predicting continued friction over the strait. Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute told Al Jazeera that Trump’s own pattern — repeatedly threatening major strikes and then pulling back while claiming a deal is imminent — has itself weakened his negotiating position, a dynamic Robert Pape of the University of Chicago describes as an “escalation trap.”

What else is happening regionally?

Away from the US-Iran track, Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Turkey’s president and Pakistan’s prime minister signed a joint defense pact in Mecca, declaring that an armed attack on any one of the three states would be treated as an attack on all three. The timing, alongside the Hormuz negotiations, points to wider regional maneuvering as the conflict’s outcome remains unsettled.

What happens next?

The immediate next step is finalizing the Hormuz shipping framework between Iran and Oman, which Iranian state media say is nearly done. Beyond that, the path is uncertain: Iran’s own timetable suggests nuclear talks proper won’t resume for months, and its list of preconditions — sanctions relief, an end to the port blockade, unfrozen assets, non-belligerence guarantees — gives Tehran multiple points at which it can slow things further. Trump, meanwhile, continues to publicly predict an imminent end to the war even as reports of US weapons shortages raise questions about how sustainable continued military pressure would be.

Sources

Featured photo: European Space Agency (ESA) via Wikimedia Commons (Attribution)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top