Africa’s football body backs Infantino as Europe holds firm on World Cup boycott threat

Gianni Infantino

Coverage spread: 3 sources — 3 international

Lean ratings via AllSides / Media Bias-Fact-Check. How this works.

Where they agree

  • CAF’s Executive Committee unanimously reconfirmed support for Infantino on Thursday.
  • The controversial plan to sell World Cup and other competition stakes to private investors (via the FIFA Forward Enterprise) was withdrawn amid backlash.
  • UEFA maintains it has lost confidence in Infantino and that its boycott conditions have not been met despite FIFA’s apology.
  • Support for Infantino splits along regional lines: Africa (CAF), South America (CONMEBOL), Mexico and Argentina back him, while UEFA and England’s FA do not.

Where they differ

  • BBC World focuses on explaining why African federations back Infantino, tying it to reliance on the FIFA Forward funding program and detailing country-by-country positions (Morocco, Egypt).
  • Al Jazeera emphasizes CAF president Motsepe’s calls for governance and transparency alongside the endorsement, plus quotes from Motsepe’s earlier personal loyalty to Infantino.
  • BBC Sport’s boycott-focused piece highlights England’s FA withdrawing support and UEFA’s sharp rebuttal that FIFA’s defense ‘changes nothing,’ giving more weight to the opposition side.
  • France24’s coverage is brief and mainly frames the story as FIFA ‘closing ranks’ amid a leadership crisis, without detailing the specific African or South American endorsements.

The Confederation of African Football (CAF) unanimously reconfirmed its support for FIFA president Gianni Infantino on Thursday, deepening a split in world football over his now-abandoned plan to sell stakes in FIFA competitions, including the World Cup, to private investors. On the same day, UEFA said it remains committed to boycotting future World Cups at all levels unless Infantino leaves office, while England’s FA formally withdrew its backing of him.

What was the plan that triggered the crisis?

Infantino had proposed creating a subsidiary called the FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) to sell commercial rights tied to FIFA’s tournaments, including the men’s and women’s World Cups, to private investors. As part of the pitch, he reportedly offered all member associations $40 million each if they backed the proposal. National federations, particularly in Europe, said they were sidelined from the process and denounced it as an opaque, back-room deal. The backlash became, in BBC’s description, the fiercest revolt of Infantino’s presidency since he took office in 2016.

How did FIFA respond, and was that enough?

Facing the revolt, Infantino convened FIFA’s management board in Rabat, Morocco, on Wednesday and, alongside secretary general Mattias Grafstrom, issued a “Joint Update” acknowledging “mistakes” in how the FFE plan was handled and apologizing that member associations were made to feel excluded. The proposal itself was withdrawn. UEFA said that wasn’t sufficient: its statement declared that Infantino’s defense “changes nothing,” reiterating that it has lost confidence in his presidency and that its conditions — full withdrawal of the sell-off plan plus guarantees such a move would never be attempted again — had not been met. Grafstrom himself had earlier called the FFE episode “a sad and reproachable series of events” in an internal staff memo, though he and Infantino later appeared side by side, smiling, at a Women’s Africa Cup of Nations match in Malawi vs. Zambia.

Who is actually backing Infantino now?

CAF’s Executive Committee, representing 54 of FIFA’s 211 member associations, gave unanimous support and thanked Infantino for his backing of African football. CAF president Patrice Motsepe endorsed the Joint Update but stressed the need for “good governance, due process, and transparency.” Days before the scandal broke, Motsepe had called Infantino “a loyal friend” and said he would not “stab him in the back.” Five of Africa’s seven FIFA Council members — from Egypt, Morocco, Niger, Mauritania and Comoros — publicly pledged support, along with Veron Mosengo-Omba, the newly elected head of the DR Congo federation and a former CAF general secretary. Morocco’s federation president Fouzi Lekjaa called Infantino’s decision to withdraw the FFE plan “wise.” Beyond Africa, South America’s CONMEBOL also backed Infantino on Thursday, as did the football associations of Mexico and Argentina — the 2026 World Cup co-host and the reigning World Cup runners-up. FIFA itself issued a statement fully backing its president on Wednesday.

Why is Africa’s support tied to money?

BBC reporting ties African backing largely to FIFA Forward, a funding program Infantino launched in 2016 that many African federations depend on for infrastructure, youth development, coaching and women’s football projects, in a continent where government and commercial investment in the sport is limited. Morocco in particular has become a key FIFA partner: Rabat hosts FIFA’s Africa regional office, has held FIFA Club World Cup and women’s U17 World Cup events, and will co-host the 2030 men’s World Cup with Spain and Portugal. Egypt, home to CAF’s headquarters, remains a strong institutional ally partly through the influence of FIFA Council member Hany Abo Rida, a longtime Infantino associate.

What happens next?

The confederations are now split roughly along regional lines: UEFA and England’s FA are pressing for change and holding open the threat of a boycott of World Cup competitions at all levels, while CAF, CONMEBOL, and federations in Mexico and Argentina have lined up behind Infantino. Infantino is seeking re-election as FIFA president in March next year, and this alignment of votes — CAF’s 54 associations alone are a substantial bloc within FIFA’s 211 members — will likely shape whether he faces serious opposition. No resolution to the boycott threat had been reached as of Thursday’s statements, and UEFA’s language suggests the dispute is not close to settled.

Sources

Featured photo: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top