Ex-Border Patrol agent, fiancée get probation for defrauding SNAP and WIC in Yuma

Yuma County Superior Court, Arizona

Coverage spread: 2 sources — 2 unrated

Lean ratings via AllSides / Media Bias-Fact-Check. How this works.

Where they agree

  • A former CBP agent, Saul Rivas Hau, and his fiancée, Hilda Sanchez, were sentenced for defrauding food assistance programs in Yuma County.
  • Both pleaded guilty to felony theft and were ordered to pay restitution tied to SNAP and WIC fraud.
  • The case was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes as part of enforcement against benefits fraud.

Where they differ

  • AZFamily provides extensive detail — exact dates, restitution amount, sentencing terms, and a full quote from AG Mayes — while 12 News Phoenix offers only a brief, low-detail note.
  • AZFamily specifies both SNAP and WIC fraud with distinct date ranges, whereas 12 News’ short item mentions only SNAP.
  • AZFamily names both defendants and their relationship, while 12 News refers only generically to ‘the Border Patrol agent.’

A former U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent and his fiancée have been sentenced in Yuma County for defrauding two federal food assistance programs, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes announced. Saul Rivas Hau and Hilda Sanchez each pleaded guilty to felony theft and received 36 months of supervised probation, along with a joint order to repay $26,424 in restitution.

What exactly did they do?

According to prosecutors, Hau and Sanchez conspired to fraudulently collect Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits from March 2022 through August 2025, and Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) benefits from February 2023 through January 2024. The scheme ran for years and cost the programs more than $25,000. Notably, the fraud continued while Hau was actively employed as a Border Patrol agent, raising questions about how a federal law enforcement officer was able to improperly draw benefits meant for lower-income families over such an extended period.

What were they charged with, and how did the case resolve?

A state grand jury indicted both Hau and Sanchez on multiple felony counts, including conspiracy, fraudulent schemes, theft, and forgery. Rather than go to trial, both defendants pleaded guilty to felony theft in Yuma County Superior Court. The plea resolved the case with probation rather than prison time, plus the restitution order requiring them to repay the full amount improperly obtained.

Why is the Attorney General’s office highlighting this case?

Attorney General Kris Mayes framed the sentencing as part of a broader effort to protect public assistance programs from abuse. In a written statement, Mayes said programs like SNAP and WIC exist to help Arizona families put food on the table, not to be exploited for personal gain, and pledged that her office will keep working with federal and state partners to hold accountable anyone who defrauds these programs. The case fits a pattern of state prosecutors publicizing benefit-fraud convictions as a deterrent and to reassure the public that misuse of taxpayer-funded assistance programs is being policed.

How does the coverage compare?

The Arizona Attorney General’s office, via AZFamily, provided the bulk of the reported detail: the names of both defendants, the specific dollar figures, the exact date ranges for each program’s fraud, the sentencing terms, and Mayes’ full quote. 12 News Phoenix covered the same underlying case but published only a brief note confirming that the indictment accused the former Border Patrol agent of fraudulently obtaining SNAP benefits, without independently adding new facts beyond what the Attorney General’s announcement already established.

What’s still unclear?

The available reporting does not specify how the fraud was originally detected, what CBP has done or plans to do regarding Hau’s employment status, or how the two programs’ payouts were misused (for example, whether income or household information was falsified). Neither source indicates whether Hau still works for Customs and Border Protection or has faced any separate federal employment consequences tied to the case.

Sources

Featured photo: American Fact Finder Thematic Mapping Tool via Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top