Maryland Legislature Sends Redistricting Amendment to November Ballot

Maryland State House, Annapolis, Maryland

Coverage spread: 2 sources — 1 left · 1 right

Lean ratings via AllSides / Media Bias-Fact-Check. How this works.

Where they agree

  • The Legislature passed the amendment Tuesday, with the House voting 96-38 and the Senate 34-11.
  • The amendment itself does not redraw any congressional lines and won’t affect the 2026 midterms; it changes the legal framework for future map-drawing.
  • It responds to a 2022 court ruling that struck down a Democratic-drawn map for violating compactness and equal-population standards.
  • Democrats currently hold seven of Maryland’s eight House seats, with Republican Andy Harris holding the only GOP seat, which could be targeted if voters approve the measure.

Where they differ

  • NBC News gives far more detail on the political backstory, including Senate President Bill Ferguson’s monthslong resistance and the pressure from Gov. Wes Moore and Hakeem Jeffries that changed his position.
  • NBC News ties the timing directly to a Supreme Court ruling weakening the Voting Rights Act as the trigger for Ferguson’s reversal; the New York Post does not mention this ruling.
  • The New York Post focuses more on floor drama, detailing Sen. Stephen Hershey Jr.’s procedural delay tactic and quoting multiple Republican lawmakers’ objections at length.
  • The New York Post places the story in a wider national tally of Republican-redrawn states and potential seat gains, while NBC News more narrowly contrasts Democratic vs. Republican seat-gain estimates without listing all the GOP states.

What lawmakers actually voted on

Maryland’s Democratic-controlled Legislature voted Tuesday to place a constitutional amendment on the November ballot. The Maryland House passed it 96-38 by voice vote, and the state Senate approved it 34-11. The amendment doesn’t redraw any congressional district itself. Instead, it clarifies that certain constitutional requirements — that districts be “compact in form” and of “substantially equal population,” and give “due regard” to natural boundaries and political subdivisions — apply only to state legislative (General Assembly) districts, not congressional ones. It would also give the Maryland Supreme Court “original jurisdiction” to review future congressional maps.

House Speaker Joseline Peña-Melnyk said the bill “does not draw congressional districts,” “does not change a single line on the map,” and “does not affect the upcoming 2026 election.” She framed it as giving voters a chance to decide whether Maryland’s constitution should work the same way other states’ constitutions do when it comes to congressional line-drawing.

Why this matters for the House map

Maryland currently sends seven Democrats and one Republican to the U.S. House; Rep. Andy Harris holds the state’s only GOP seat. If voters approve the amendment in November, it would free the Legislature — should it choose to act before the 2028 election — to redraw congressional boundaries without the compactness and “due regard” constraints, potentially allowing Democrats to eliminate Harris’s district and claim all eight seats. The amendment is a direct response to a 2022 episode in which a state judge struck down a Democratic-drawn congressional map for improperly favoring Democrats and violating those very constitutional standards.

Senate President Bill Ferguson had resisted joining the mid-decade redistricting fight for months, worried an aggressive new map would get thrown out in court again. He came under pressure from Gov. Wes Moore and U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries to act ahead of the midterms. Ferguson reversed course after a Supreme Court ruling this spring weakened the Voting Rights Act, which Democrats say further cleared the way for Republican-led states to redraw maps aggressively. The constitutional-amendment approach, rather than an immediate map redraw, was what ultimately eased Ferguson’s legal concerns.

How Republicans responded

Maryland Republicans opposed the measure sharply. State Sen. Chris West argued the bill was not a mere clarification but “a critical policy choice” that he said repeals residents’ rights to free elections, equal protection, and freedom of speech. Senate Minority Leader Stephen Hershey Jr. used a procedural rule requiring bills to be delivered to the Senate secretary at least four hours before introduction to delay the measure, forcing the chamber to reconvene later in the day. Hershey said Republicans knew passage was inevitable given the Democratic supermajority but wanted to make the process “as uncomfortable as possible.” House Minority Leader Jason Bucknel called the effort “the dimmest thing we ever did,” arguing lawmakers should instead be focused on affordability, taxes, disability services and budget problems. Other Republicans called the move “disrespectful” and an attempt to “silence” their voices.

The national redistricting fight behind it

Maryland’s move is part of a broader, national scramble over mid-decade redistricting. Eight Republican-controlled states — Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas — have redrawn congressional maps in recent years in ways that could help Republicans gain as many as 16 House seats in the midterms. Democrats have had far fewer opportunities to counter because they control full government trigger points in fewer states and often face their own constitutional restrictions; by one estimate, their countermoves could net around six seats. Virginia Democrats have already put a competing redistricting referendum on their state’s ballot this year, and some other states, including Utah and California, have seen related redistricting activity.

What happens next

The amendment now goes to Maryland voters in November. If approved, it would not change anything for the 2026 midterm elections — the current eight-district map stays in place through that cycle. But it would open the door for lawmakers to redraw congressional boundaries under the new legal framework in time for the 2028 election, with the state Supreme Court positioned to review any resulting map directly.

Sources

Featured photo: Don Ramey Logan via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 4.0)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top