Senate panel advances Blanche’s AG nomination amid abortion and ‘weaponization fund’ controversies

Todd Blanche

Coverage spread: 3 sources — 1 left · 2 center

Lean ratings via AllSides / Media Bias-Fact-Check. How this works.

Where they agree

  • The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12-10 along party lines to advance Todd Blanche’s nomination for attorney general.
  • The vote followed a prior canceled vote after GOP Sens. John Cornyn and Thom Tillis refused to support Blanche over the ‘anti-weaponization fund.’
  • Blanche, currently acting attorney general and Trump’s former personal attorney, still needs 50 votes on the full Senate floor to be confirmed.
  • Democrats on the committee, including Sen. Richard Blumenthal, argued the documents Blanche provided did not prove the fund was truly dead.

Where they differ

  • The Hill is the only outlet reporting Blanche’s private remarks to faith leaders about rolling back abortion protections nationwide; CNBC and CBS News do not mention this at all.
  • CNBC provides the most detailed breakdown of Senate floor math, naming undecided GOP senators (Murkowski, Cassidy, Collins) and calculating exactly how many defections Blanche can survive.
  • CBS News’ report is a brief video-focused piece with little substantive detail beyond noting ‘DOJ fund fears,’ offering less depth than CNBC or The Hill.
  • The Hill’s own coverage is split between two separate stories with different emphases: one on the committee vote mechanics, another entirely on the abortion-related allegations.

What happened

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12-10 along party lines on Tuesday to advance Todd Blanche’s nomination to be U.S. attorney general, sending it to the full Senate for a confirmation vote. Blanche, President Trump’s former personal attorney, has been serving as acting attorney general. The vote came a week after an earlier committee vote was scrapped when Republican Sens. John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina refused to support Blanche.

Cornyn and Tillis had withheld their votes over what’s been called the “anti-weaponization fund,” a controversial Justice Department program. The two senators said they wanted written confirmation that the fund was being shut down, not just verbal assurances. Blanche struck a deal with them and posted documents on social media that he said proved the program’s end, which satisfied both senators and cleared the path for the committee vote.

Democrats on the committee weren’t convinced. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut called the documents Blanche posted “a sham” and “a fraud on the Congress,” arguing the fund could still be revived later. Every Democrat on the committee voted against Blanche; every Republican voted for him.

The abortion allegations

Separately, The Hill reported that Blanche told faith leaders on a private call that he intends to roll back abortion access even in states with laws protecting it. The call, hosted by the White House Faith Office, included the religious group Intercessors for America. According to the report, Blanche described plans to undo Biden-administration-era protections for abortion access, with the goal of making the effects of the Dobbs decision — which overturned Roe v. Wade — permanent nationwide, including in states that currently protect abortion rights.

What comes next on the Senate floor

Committee approval only gets Blanche partway there. He still needs 50 votes on the full Senate floor. With Republicans holding a 53-47 majority and Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky on extended medical leave, Blanche can afford to lose no more than two GOP votes. Several Republican senators haven’t said how they’ll vote, including Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, and Susan Collins of Maine. That makes the floor vote’s outcome uncertain even after the committee’s approval.

How the coverage differs

CNBC and CBS News both focus narrowly on the committee vote and the weaponization-fund dispute, treating the Cornyn-Tillis standoff and its resolution as the main story. CNBC goes further into the mechanics of the Senate math, spelling out exactly how many GOP defections Blanche can withstand and naming the undecided senators. CBS News’ coverage is a video segment with minimal accompanying text, framing the story around lingering “DOJ fund fears” without much elaboration.

The Hill runs two distinct threads. One of its pieces covers the same committee vote as CNBC and CBS, noting the prior canceled vote and Cornyn’s role in securing changes. The other Hill piece is entirely different in focus: it reports on Blanche’s private remarks to faith leaders about rolling back abortion protections nationwide, a story the other outlets don’t mention at all. This means readers relying only on CNBC or CBS would miss the abortion-related allegations entirely, while readers of The Hill’s abortion story alone would miss the detailed Senate procedural fight.

Why this matters

Blanche’s confirmation fight touches two separate flashpoints. The weaponization-fund dispute reflects ongoing concern, even among some Republicans, about the Justice Department being used for political retaliation — a concern serious enough that two GOP senators held up a committee vote until they got written assurances. Democrats remain skeptical those assurances mean anything lasting.

The abortion allegations, if accurate, suggest Blanche intends to use the Justice Department to affect abortion policy well beyond the states that already restrict it, extending into states that have moved to protect access. Combined with the narrow margin Blanche faces on the Senate floor, both issues could become factors in how undecided senators like Murkowski, Cassidy, and Collins ultimately vote on his confirmation.

Key facts

The committee vote was 12-10, split entirely along party lines. Blanche needs 50 votes on the Senate floor and can lose no more than two Republicans given the current 53-47 majority and McConnell’s absence. The weaponization fund at the center of the GOP holdout has been described by Blanche as terminated, though Democrats dispute that characterization. The abortion-related remarks were made on a call hosted by the White House Faith Office with the group Intercessors for America.

Sources

Featured photo: BruceSchaff via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top