Trump Accuses Iran of Duplicity Over Talks as Energy Markets Remain on Edge

Donald Trump

Coverage spread: 2 sources — 1 left · 1 center

Lean ratings via AllSides / Media Bias-Fact-Check. How this works.

Where they agree

  • Trump said he called off a planned major strike on Iran to allow room for a deal on Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program.
    Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson publicly denied any negotiations with the U.S., saying Iran was only dealing with Oman on a safe shipping route.
    Trump publicly accused Iran of being “unbelievably duplicitous” for denying talks after supposedly requesting them.
    Trump later insisted, contradicting Iran’s denial, that talks were actively taking place.

Where they differ

  • NBC News frames the story around the confusion and contradiction between Trump’s claims and Iran’s denial; The Hill’s article (on a Chevron CEO’s comments about oil market risk) provided no text to compare.
    NBC News highlights Trump’s shifting statements within the same day — first accusing Iran of lying, then claiming talks were happening after all.
    NBC News notes Trump’s dual message of openness to a deal alongside continued threats of “decapitation,” reflecting an ambiguous, high-stakes posture not fully resolved by day’s end.

What Trump said happened

President Donald Trump said the United States and Iran were set to hold new discussions, after he called off what he described as planned intense new strikes to allow room for a deal covering the Strait of Hormuz and Tehran’s nuclear program. Speaking aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington from New Jersey, Trump said the strikes he shelved would have been “the biggest attack since World War II” and that the U.S. was “holding” a massive operation that could still be launched “anytime we want.”

Trump said he would rather reach a deal than continue military action, telling reporters “I’m not looking to kill people,” while also warning Iran that “this is a last chance for them to sign a good document” before what he called “decapitation.” He said Iran does not face a strict deadline to reach an agreement.

Iran’s denial and Trump’s reaction

Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei told reporters that Iran was not negotiating with the United States and had no plans to host foreign delegations or send negotiators abroad in the near future. He said Iran’s actual discussions were with Oman, over arranging a temporary safe shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump responded on Truth Social, calling the Iranian leadership “unbelievably duplicitous.” He wrote that Iranian officials had asked for — “some would say ‘beg'” — a meeting, that talks had begun with more scheduled, and then Iran turned around and publicly denied any discussions were taking place, claiming it was only dealing with Oman.

Later, at the White House, Trump told reporters the talks were in fact “going on right now,” suggesting the back-and-forth over whether negotiations exist is itself part of the diplomatic dance: “we’ll say we have or we don’t have… but they deny it. But they’re not denying it now. They just put out a statement not denying it.” He also said the Strait of Hormuz would be fully open to marine traffic by the next day, calling that “phase one” of a process whose second phase would address Iran’s nuclear program.

A pattern of on-again, off-again diplomacy

This is not the first time the administration has swung between escalation and diplomacy. Trump has repeatedly threatened major attacks and then pulled back, citing progress in talks, only for negotiations to collapse and for the two sides to resume strikes against each other. The current episode fits that pattern: a canceled major strike, a claimed opening for negotiation, and immediate public disagreement over whether any negotiation is actually happening.

Limits of what’s confirmed

Beyond Trump’s own statements and Iran’s denial through its foreign ministry spokesperson, there is no independent confirmation of the shape or substance of any active U.S.-Iran talks. It remains unclear what, if anything, was agreed to secure the pause in strikes, what “parameters of a deal” Trump referenced from Sunday actually include, or whether Iran’s dealings with Oman over the strait are connected to any broader negotiation with Washington. Iran did not respond directly to Trump’s “duplicitous” accusation as of the reporting.

Sources

Featured photo: United States Department of Justice via Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top